Skip to main content

Vital force

Bergson said "the spirit embraces the past, while the body is confined in a present that constantly begins again and again". Indeed, our mind handles content that come from the past but it works organically in the pure present, which is constantly renewed independently of those memories. All true operation, mental or of any kind, necessarily occurs in the present...
We do not perceive the present in a pure way, we can only to intuit; it is a hidden variable to our direct knowledge and we just can make suppositions, because all perception is contaminated by traces of the past, by the knowledge we have been setting over time. Memories shape our perception of objects and events that occur now. However everything real occurs now, in 'a present that continually starts again and again' and in which we are confined. It seems a terrible paradox.
The present is the duration of the phenomena, the duration of the actions of our body and our perceptual and cognitive systems. The present is biology. Any activity of our body is hopelessly confined to it. It is an unstable, shifting, biology, made of events and actions, which makes change our psychology beyond the mental contents and their associations in memory. The variable physiological activity that underlies the mind is pure action and succession, while the mind, subjective result of such succession, is a continuous recreation of the past, is an invention of the past from an organic mind that although we sense it, we do not know it.

Physical activity of mind, with its own variations, is not encodable to mind itself, it is not perceptible as mental content that has to be fixed in memory, although it is 'perceived' many times in a sensory level and in a high degree. The physiology behind the mind does not enter into its own electrophysiological circuits as content, since it is what sustains them, gives them energy, makes vary, work and flow them. No activity by itself can to represent itself; something like that simply can not exist.
This is a totally animal primary reality, that just happens, without logic, and that makes you feel subjective states and which unfolds, yet now, the logic of the contents of your mind. This dyes that contents, modulates them, but is not one of them. These variable physiological states affect all mental functioning, memory, thought, emotions but are not assimilated as content. They break the rules of the association of ideas. Do not work as memory traces or contents or thoughts, can not be integrated into the informational circuits. But we feel them and they affect the whole. They are much more primary, are the price we pay for being biological organisms, for being alive; they are the specificity of our biology. They are the 'elan vital', the 'vital force'. They are what always will differentiate us from the most sophisticated machine that can ever exist.


Popular posts from this blog

Prana, qi, ki...

‘Prana’ is a Sanskrit word for breath or ‘air inspired’ (from the verb ‘pran’: aspire), but also means ‘universal and invisible energy that enters the body through breathing’. Prana is a physical principle that permeates all forms of life, that which gives life and wisdom to beings and that is or comes from a kind of ‘universal spirit’. The first mention of the word ‘prana’ appears in the Rig-Veda, the oldest text of India, in the mid-second millennium B.C.
Prana shares the global sense of ‘air-life-wisdom’ with many terms of different ancient cultures: Greek ‘psyché’ and ‘pneuma’, Hebrew ‘ruach’ and ‘néfesh’, Latin ‘spiritus’ and ‘anemos’, Arabic ‘ruh’... or the Hindu atman, which also means soul while air or breath. (See the post ‘Pneuma...’ of this blog). Often, too, prana is confused with jiva, another Sanskrit term for soul-air, as there is a close connection between them. Jiva, in particular, would be the portion of air or prana which is located specifically in the cavity of the h…

The physical philosophers: Anaximenes.

The work of the pre-Socratic Ionian philosophers often has been interpreted, over centuries, in a simplistic way throught the prism of a modern reductionist materialism that actually has little to do with the original approach of these ancient thinkers. It has been done, many times, a naive reading of their thesis on the elements of earth, water, air and fire as creative principles of the universe. A classical naturalist aproach considered these authors the remote initiators of the natural sciences, which visions and solutions becamed logically obsolete. These called physical philosophers have made contributions of great merit to geography, astronomy, meteorology, mathematics and biology, certainly, but their production is not limited, in my opinion, to the conventional interpretation throught the prism of current science, as their purpose was not that of making a science detached from the whole of man and his daily experiences. Do not be fooled, they were philosophers in the broadest…

Giordano Bruno. The magic.

Giordano Bruno argues in the book ‘De la Magia’ that the absolute vacuum does not exist, there is no space not occupied by any form of matter: In any space, empty as it may seem, there are bodies moving and passing but the invisible air particles, which are also matter. The objects of the world are not isolated from each other, among them there is a continuum of matter, he states; imperceptible space among perceptible bodies is a continuum, rather than separate, mediates between them, communicates and keeps them united. The air (or 'aerial or ethereal spirit' as Bruno calls) is an imperceptible body, in principle, to our senses but by itself is a true physical intermediary continuous among all bodies, which is endowed with great activity and effectiveness upon the soul, that is closely united to it, he says, and has a strong resemblance to it, at a time that is very different from substance of thicker perceptible objects that it links.
"The vacuum, i.e. a space without bodi…